Two days ago I had served Stutz with a check for $3000 for sanctions. Judge Judith Hayes imposed the sanctions because I violated her shockingly unconstitutional PERMANENT injunction NEVER TO MENTION THE NAME OF STUTZ ARTIANO SHINOFF & HOLTZ on my website.
Yesterday and today I asked Stutz, via phone calls and emails, if the check had arrived. After all my efforts, the only response I got was an email that said, "Who was it addressed to? That may make it easier to locate. Thank you. -- Richard"
Perhaps Richard was at a loss because his mentors Ray Artiano, Daniel Shinoff and Jeffrey Wade were not available to tell him whether or not to tell the truth about receiving my check. I'm guessing he was able to get an okay from one of them at around 2:28 p.m. today, so at last he told the truth in an email: "Please disregard my last e-mail, the check has arrived. Thank you. -- Richard"
This was the fifth incident, since Stutz law firm's defamation case against me began, that critically important documents in the case disappeared into the noxious ether that seems to permeate the firm's office.
NOTE TO JUDGE HAYES: This incident illustrates why we Americans keep the First Amendment to our Constitution. If law firms that represent public entities were free to cheat and lie, then government would become impossibly corrupt. Free speech keeps government honest, or at least it pushes it in that direction. We've got a long way to go until we actually have honest public entities, it seems. Why are you so intent on keeping the public ignorant of the truth about Stutz law firm?
No comments:
Post a Comment